![]() |
Before viewing any of the following articles or presentations, please be sure to read the usage statement. FRICTION REDUCTION STUDIES ON LUBRICANTS CONTAINING MOLYBDENUM (MOLYVAN 855) By Thomas J. Karol, Ph.D. and Steven G. Donnelly (Manager of Technical Services) The synergisms delineated in this disclosure (U.S. Patent and EP 0 874 040 A1 pending) are recommended for lubricating oils and greases. This would include gasoline and diesel motor oil and grease products. This technology is particularly suited for greases used in constant velocity joints (of the fixed type joints or slide type joints) and further discussions will follow in future "Research s" disclosures. The following series of experiments was conducted to demonstrate the synergistic performance of MOLYVAN® 855 (MV-855) in lubricating compositions. MV-855 is an organomolybdenum complex prepared by reacting about 1 mole fatty oil, about 1.0 to 2.5 moles diethanolamine and a molybdenum source sufficient to yield about 0.1 to 12.0 percent of molybdenum based on the weight of the complex. Since the primary purpose of lubricants is to protect metal surfaces, changes in the surface metallurgy of steel were investigated by using the individual components and the synergistic compositions. The Base Oil (BO) (UNINAPâ 100SD, commercially available from Diamond Shamrock Corp.) was selected because of its very low sulfur content and good solubility (similar to fully formulated motor oil). TABLE 1 BASE OIL SPECIFICATIONS Description: Severely Hydrotreated Naphthenic Oil
TABLE 2 FALEX NO. 1 FRICTION AND WEAR, TEST SPECIMENS Test blocks: Low pressure design, 4620 Steel, RC 58 63, 6-12rms Test ring: S-10, 4620 steel, RC 58-63, 6-12 rms. TABLE 3 4620 STEEL COMPOSITION (G46200 Ni-Mo Alloy Steel), mass percent
TABLE 4 FALEX NO. 1 FRICTION AND WEAR, TEST CONDITIONS Test Conditions: Fluid Volume: 100 mL, Fluid Temperature: 108°C, Rotational Speed: 800 rpm, Bale Load: 2.25 Kg, Actual Load on Specimen: 22.5 Kg, Test Duration: 90 minutes Low Pressure Block Design creates an area contact with S- 10 Ring. TABLE 5 FALEX NO. 1 PROCEDURE
TABLE 6 COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION
The data in Table 6 show the friction reduction properties of the base oil versus the base oil treated with ZnDTP and ashless friction modifier (MV-855 precursor), and also the base oil treated with ZnDTP and MV-855. This demonstrates little frictional benefit from the ashless friction modifier in combination with ZnDTP versus the base oil. Therefore, the incorporation of molybdenum in combination with ZnDTP results in a substantial reduction in friction. TABLE 7 COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION
The data in Table 7 show that the MV-855 combination with ZnDTP has a dramatically reduced coefficient of friction (consistent with unexpected synergism) versus the molybdate or ZnDTP performance alone in the base oil. Note in Table 7 that the wear film of ZnDTP does not significantly increase or decrease friction due to the physical difference in the surface coating (iron phosphate) versus the friction resulting from boundary/hydrodynamic lubrication. The molybdate additive-ZnDTP combination demonstrates a dramatic improvement in wear and frictional properties. TABLE 8 COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION
The data in Table 8 show the synergistic performance of the molybdate complex with substituted 1,3,4-thiadiazole antiwear additive. VL-871 has superior performance versus the ZnDTP. Unlike many other sulfur additives, oxidatively stressed oil containing this additive demonstrates retention of the chemically intact additive (by Liquid Chromatography). Therefore, VL-871 does not function as a "sulfur donor" due to the stability of the compound. To investigate the interaction of the substituted 1,3,4-thiadiazole (VL-871) in combination with the molybdate (MV-855) on the metal surface, the following tests were conducted. The same base oil and Falex No. 1 test equipment was utilized, but the test procedure has been modified as delineated below. TABLE 9 COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION - TEST SPECIMENS RUN DRY - Evaluations: (1) Conditioning of metal test specimens with molybdate additive (MV-855):
TABLE 10 COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION
Results indicate that the surface metallurgy has changed to provide significantly lower frictional properties of the metallurgy when the combination of thiadiazole derivative and molybdate are used. The reference coefficient of friction for the untreated metallurgy is consistent with the literature. Literature reference for coefficient of friction of hard steel on hard steel (dry) is 0.42, [Mechanical Engineers Handbook, Lionel S. Marks, page 218 (5th ed. 1952)]. The following data were obtained via the aforementioned procedure. Two 90 minute (2X 90 min.) lubricated conditioning runs were conducted on each metal specimen prior to the non-lubricant run (except for the reference new block and ring metal specimens). TABLE 11 COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION METAL SPECIMENS RUN WITH NO LUBRICANT (AFTER CONDITIONING WITH LUBRICANT AND ULTRASONIC CLEANING)
X-RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY (XPS) ON TEST BLOCK FROM FALEX NO. 1 FRICTION TEST Surface analysis on test block was conducted after first 90-minute test run followed by thorough cleaning of the metal specimens to remove lubricant residues. The frictional data of the conditioning with the lubricant are compiled in Table 12. The XPS analysis was accomplished on these metal specimens after ultrasonic cleaning and the data are compiled in Table 13. TABLE 12
CHEVRON CHEMICAL CORP.), MV-855: molybdate additive (400ppm Mo). TABLE 13 XPS DEPTH PROFILE Sample: conditioned block with BO containing molybdate friction modifier (MV-855) /ZnDTP2.
The XPS data in atomic percent here demonstrate that molybdenum doping is found down to 60 angstroms supporting the assumption that metallurgical changes have occurred. This is clear when comparing a similar lubricant conditioned block with an ashless friction modifier (the molybdate precursor but no molybdenum) in the XPS profile in Table 14. TABLE 14 XPS DEPTH PROFILE Sample: conditioned block with BO containing ashless friction modifier (molybdate precursor but no molybdenum)/ZnDTP2; after ultrasonic cleaning of the metal specimens, the XPS analysis was conducted.
The following data demonstrate the frictional data which is interrelated to wear of the claimed synergism of the invention. This data further support the unexpected interaction since the above experimental data show that the components perform dramatically differently than would be expected from the individual components. TABLE 15 Falex No. 1 Friction Test Results - Low Pressure Base Oil-Uninap 100SD Friction Force,lb (Coefficient of Friction)
Other than supporting the unexpected performance of the additive combination, the above data also show that all sulfur compounds do not afford this performance. This is clearly the case of the polysulfurized isobutylene additive, which is used for comparison and does not demonstrate synergism with MV-855. It is clear from metallurgical science that molybdenum iron/steel is harder and thus improves the wear performance of the metal. The data presented within demonstrate that molybdenum is incorporated into the metallurgy and that the specific synergistic combinations of the technology facilitate this metallurgical change. The frictional property changes have been presented. The following data are additional experiments to demonstrate the unexpected wear performance induced by the invention as a direct result of the metallurgical changes demonstrated. TABLE 16 FALEX PIN AND VEE BLOCK TESTING Weight Loss, mg
The above embodiments have shown various aspects of the MV 855 synergism. Other variations will be evident to those skilled in the art and such modifications are intended to be within the scope of this disclosure. APPENDIX 1 VANLUBE® 871 is an organic sulfur compound selected from the group consisting of (i) 1,3,4-thiadiazole compounds of the formula:
maleic acid residue of the formula
Use of Information
The information presented herein, while not guaranteed, was prepared by technical personnel and, to the best of our knowledge and belief, is true and accurate as of the date hereof. No warranty, representation or guarantee, express or implied, is made regarding accuracy, performance, stability, reliability or use. This information is not intended to be all-inclusive, because the manner and conditions of use, handling, storage and other factors may involve other or additional safety or performance considerations. The user is responsible for determining the suitability of any material for a specific purpose and for adopting such safety precautions as may be required. R. T. Vanderbilt Company does not warrant the results to be obtained in using any material, and disclaims all liability with respect to the use, handling or further processing of any such material.
No suggestion for use is intended as, and nothing herein shall be construed as, a recommendation to infringe any existing patent or to violate any federal, state or local law or regulation.
[ Click to Top of Page ] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
R.T. Vanderbilt Company, Inc. 30 Winfield Street Norwalk, CT 06856 800.243.6064 fax:203.853.1452 |